KAIZO / FIELD NOTESmaps

Build a Distance-Based LOD Test for FiveM Maps

Use fixed approach routes and distance markers to find map props that pop, vanish or stay detailed long after players leave.

Build a Distance-Based LOD Test for FiveM MapsKAIZO Team
Editorial cover image.

Map LOD defects rarely reveal themselves while a developer stands inside the finished area. Players approach from highways, rooftops, aircraft routes and neighboring streets. From those viewpoints, a building may appear too late, a roof prop may float before its support loads, or decorative geometry may stay unnecessarily detailed across several blocks. A distance-based route makes the exterior transition testable without turning the review into a subjective sightseeing session.

Map the likely approach paths

List the three routes players use most: the normal road entrance, a fast vehicle approach and an elevated view if helicopters or rooftops matter on your server. Record start and end coordinates for each route. Keep the same weather and time of day so shadows and haze do not hide changes. For an interior, include the exterior shell and entrance, but keep this test focused on distant map behavior rather than room-by-room collision or gameplay flow.

  • Slow road approach at normal city speed.
  • Fast approach from the nearest highway or long avenue.
  • Elevated or rooftop view where the server permits it.
  • Stationary sweep from a neighboring activity hotspot.

Use markers for visible changes

Place observation markers where the main structure first becomes visible, where medium detail should carry the silhouette, and where full detail is expected. You do not need to invent a universal distance threshold. Density, sightlines and the object’s gameplay importance differ by location. What matters is that each revision is judged from the same points and that the full-detail state is not used farther than the scene requires.

Judge LODs by silhouette continuity first. Small surface detail can change; the building should not appear to rebuild itself.

Record each route in both directions. Approaching reveals late loads and sudden detail jumps. Leaving reveals assets that remain expensive after their contribution to the scene is negligible. Pause at every visible transition and name the affected object: roof unit, sign support, perimeter wall, façade insert or distant shell. A timestamped object description is far more useful than “the map pops from the highway.”

Creators checking near and far geometry in a city map

Check parent-child visual dependencies

Props often depend on another object to make visual sense. A rooftop sign needs its frame; an air-conditioning fan needs its housing; a perimeter light needs its pole. If the child remains visible after the parent changes or disappears, players see floating detail. Group these dependencies in the test notes and verify their transitions together. The same principle applies to night lighting: an emissive glow should not remain after the geometry carrying it has vanished.

  • Main shell remains readable from the far marker.
  • Supporting geometry loads before attached detail becomes obvious.
  • No floating props during approach or retreat.
  • Night emissives disappear with their physical source.
  • Full-detail decorative objects are limited to useful viewing ranges.

Test with neighboring resources enabled

Run the final route with the staging resource set that matches production. Adjacent maps can change occlusion, sightlines and the amount of geometry visible at once. This is not a conflict-diagnosis pass; it is a realistic visibility pass. If the result changes only when a neighbor is active, preserve both resource versions and coordinates in the report so the mapper can reproduce the combined scene.

Add one population-aware pass without turning the test into a stress experiment. Ask several players to use the neighboring streets while the recorder follows the fixed route. Their vehicles and characters should reflect normal server activity, because extra visible entities can change when defects become obvious. Do not alter the map, spawn hundreds of props or mix this pass with unrelated script testing. Record whether the transition point moved, whether the pop became more visible and whether the route remained smooth. If only one viewpoint fails, fix that object or dependency rather than lowering detail across the entire location without evidence.

The deliverable is a short route sheet with coordinates, speed, weather, object names, timestamps and pass criteria. When requesting Map & MLO Editing, include editable source access and identify which distant elements may change without harming branding or roleplay readability. After revision, rerun the exact routes. This process keeps the discussion measurable: not whether a map “looks optimized,” but whether each important silhouette appears consistently and expensive detail leaves the scene when it should.

Keep the ideas going

More from the journal.

View all guides